Quick Link to Procurement Management
Procurement Management 12.1 Plan Procurements
Procurement Management 12.2 Conduct Procurements
Procurement Management 12.3 Administer Procurements
Procurement Management 12.4 Close Procurements
12.1 Plan Procurements
Procurement planning involves deciding which products or
services should be procured from outside the organization, specifying the
approach and identifying potential sellers. The questions to answer are
whether, hoe, what, when and how much to procure. The process should consider
the following:
·
Potential sellers (is a buy decision feasible?)
·
The desired schedule (best met through make or
buy?)
·
The risks associated with make vs. buy.
·
The appropriate type of contract.
Plan Procurements
|
||
Inputs
|
Tools
|
Outputs
|
1.
Scope baseline
2.
Requirements documentation
3.
Teaming agreements
4.
Risk register
5.
Risk-related contract decisions
6.
Activity resource requirements
7.
Project schedule
8.
Activity cost estimates
9.
Cost performance baseline
10.
Enterprise environmental factors
11.
Organizational process assets
|
1.
Make-or-buy analysis
2.
Expert judgment
3.
Contract types
|
1.
Procurement management plan
2.
Procurement statements of work
3.
Make-or-buy decisions
4.
Procurement documents
5.
Source selection criteria
6.
Change requests
|
Eleven Key Inputs for
Plan Procurements:
1. Scope Baseline: Consists of the
following components:
·
Scope
statement: Includes information such as requirements, constraints,
assumptions, list of deliverables, acceptance criteria, required delivery
dates, and available resources.
·
WBS:
Describes and organizes the work. Is a major factor in deciding what to
outsource using contracts.
·
WBS
dictionary: Provides the details for each work package and control account.
2. Requirements Documentation: Some
requirements may have contractual or legal implications; such as environmental,
intellectual property rights, health and safety, etc.
3. Teaming Agreements: Teaming agreements
are legal contractual agreements that establish joint ventures. The agreements
function exactly like contracts in that they establish terms, conditions and
roles for each party in the agreement.
4. Risk Register: Some contractual
agreements are chosen as a risk mitigation strategy and, in any case, the risk
register identifies specific risk concerns.
5. Risk-Related Contract Decisions: May
include purchasing insurance, a warranty, or outsourcing portions of the
project to another party.
6. Activity Resource Requirements:
Identifies facilities, equipment, and people needed to handle the work. If
these resources are not available in-house, the work may be outsourced using a
contract.
7. Project Schedule: Contains required
timelines that may also become the rationale for entering into a contract
(cannot meet the deadline with in-house sources) or may be needed to evaluate
the ability of a prospective contractor to meet the schedule.
8. Activity Cost Estimates: lf in-house
costs are high, this may be a reason to outsource or, conversely, the
information may be needed to evaluate proposals from prospective contractors.
9. Cost Performance Baseline: Provides the
details of planned spending throughout the project timeline.
10. Enterprise Environmental Factors:
Factors that may affect procurement planning includes:
·
Conditions of the marketplace:
o
Is the product or service available in the
marketplace?
o
Are the services of a reputable contractor
available at the right time?
·
Typical terms and conditions
·
Unique local requirements
11. Organizational Process Assets:
Organizational Process Assets may include:
·
Procurement policies and constraints:
o
Is there a buying department? lf not, members of
the project team may have to conduct procurement activities themselves.
o
Are there any requirements that certain
contracts be set aside for small and disadvantaged business?
·
Procedures for selecting contract type
·
Established supplier system and/or pre-qualified
sellers
Three Key Tools for
plan procurements:
1. Make-or-Buy Analysis: Determining the
cost effectiveness of producing an item in-house (make) versus procuring it
from an outside organization (buy). The analysis should consider both the
direct costs as well as the indirect costs (cost of monitoring the purchasing
process).
This site also states that the analysis should consider not
just the project needs and costs but the overall organization's needs and
costs, as well. For example, it may not be cost effective to purchase certain
equipment or build a new facility for an individual project. However, the
equipment or facility may also support other work in the rest of the
organization.
2. Expert Judgment: Subject matter experts
are needed to develop appropriate evaluation criteria and judge proposals that
are received. Proposals often have financial, management, and technical
considerations that are beyond the expertise of one individual. The expertise
of lawyers is often required for non- standard procurements.
3. Contract Types: several factors may
influence which type of contract is appropriate. PMI recognizes three broad
categories of contracts:
Fixed price (also called lump sum): Appropriate when the product is
well-defined and the risks are generally felt to be low. Risk is borne by the
seller because they are legally obligated to deliver the specified product even
if they incur a loss in doing so.
Cost reimbursement: Appropriate when the product is initially
difficult to define (e.g., product does not exist and must be developed) and
when risk is high. Buyers agree to reimburse the seller's actual costs plus
guaranteeing a profit. Risk is borne by the buyer. The costs include both
direct costs and indirect costs.
Time and material: A hybrid arrangement with elements of both fixed
price and cost reimbursement. On the fixed price side, the seller is paid a
preset amount per unit of service ($50 per cubic yard of gravel delivered, $200
per hour for professional services, and so on). On the cost reimbursement side,
the dollar value is based on how much material or time is actually used.
You must be familiar with seven
specific types of contracts that fall under the umbrella of the first two
categories above (fixed price and cost reimbursement).
Cost Plus Percentage of Cost (CPPC): Provides for reimbursement of
allowable costs plus an agreed percentage of the costs (as the seller's
profit). This type of contract is now illegal in the U.S. federal sector and
does not provide the type of incentives that most buyers look for in a
contractual arrangement.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF): Provides for reimbursement of allowable
costs plus a fixed fee paid proportionately as the work progresses- Risk mostly
on the buyer; used for research and development in which risk is quite high at
the beginning of the work. CPFF contracts usually have a ceiling price that
establishes an upper limit on the buyer's financial obligation. There is no financial
reward provided to the seller for keeping costs low.
Cost Plus Incentive Fee (GPIF): Provides for reimbursement of
allowable costs plus a calculated fee based on performance. The seller has an
incentive to control costs through a negotiated sharing arrangement. Minimum
and maximum levels of profit are established at the outset. Again, there is
often a ceiling price established by the contract.
Cost Plus Award Fee (GPAF): As always, legitimate and allowable
costs are reimbursed and an additional fee is paid. In this case, qualitative
performance criteria are defined in the contract and the fee is paid based on
the buyer's subjective judgment of the seller's performance. The buyer's
decision is not usually subject to appeal. Buyers like this arrangement because
it gives them enormous leverage with their sellers.
Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA): lf the
performance period spans multiple years, concerns may exist about inflation and
significant price changes for key materials or supplies. This type of contract
allows adjustments to compensate for these uncertainties. An EPA clause ties
pricing to an agreed financial index (e.g. consumer price index) and final
prices are adjusted according to whether the index went up, down, or remained
stable.
Fixed Price Incentive Fee (FPIF): Provides the seller with a fixed
price plus a calculated fee based on performance. This contract type is similar
in concept to CPIF in that there is a sharing arrangement that provides an
incentive to control costs. However, in a CPIF arrangement, the seller is
guaranteed a minimum profit. In an FPIF arrangement, it is possible for the
seller to lose money. Therefore, risk is shifting onto the seller in this type
of contract. FPIF contracts also have a ceiling price and a point of total
assumption (PTA). The PTA is the level of cost at which the sharing arrangement
ceases and any further costs come 100 percent from the seller's profit. The
course slides show an example of how to calculate the PTA.
Firm Fixed Price (Lump sum): Contracted goods and services are
furnished at an agreed fixed price. The seller bears all the risk but is
potentially rewarded with a maximum profit potential. Best suited for
situations in which risk is low and the product can be well defined.
You should also be familiar with
the concept of contract incentives. Incentives provide a "carrot"
aimed at bringing the objectives of the contractor in line with those of the
buyer. Incentives can be used in conjunction with any contract type; real world
experience has shown that incentives are extremely effective.
Six Key Outputs for
Plan Procurements:
1. Procurement Management Plan: Delineates
the types of contracts to be used, whether independent cost estimates will be
needed, how multiple providers will be managed, and the roles and
responsibilities of contracting professionals.
The plan may include all or
portions of the following:
·
Types of contracts
·
Whether independent estimates will be used
·
Constraints, assumptions, and supplier lead
times
·
Risk management
·
Formats for the statement of work and WBS
·
Coordinating procurement with resource needs,
schedules, costs, and lead times
·
Identifying pre-qualified sellers
·
Metrics for performance reporting
2. Procurement Statements of Work: A
narrative description of goods or services to be supplied under contract.
Should contain enough detail so that prospective contractors can evaluate their
own ability to meet the stated needs. Also called a statement of requirements or a statement
of objectives in some areas. The use of an SOR or an SOO often refers to a
procurement item presented as a problem to be solved (rather than a product to be
purchased).
The SOW contains information such
as the following:
·
Specifications
·
Quantity and quality
·
Period of performance and location
·
Required collateral services (management
activities such as performance reporting, earned value, or change control)
3. Make-or-Buy Decisions: Written
documentation of these decisions with supporting rationale.
4. Procurement Documents: Used to request
proposals from prospective sellers. Key points include:
·
When the procurement is price driven, the terms
bid and quotation are used.
·
When the procurement is influenced by technical
considerations and other non-financial concerns, the term proposal is used.
·
Procurement can be initiated as a unilateral
contract, which usually means a purchase order for routine items at standard
(catalog) prices. Purchase orders become enforceable at the time the supplier
ships the requested items.
·
Alternatively, procurement can be initiated as a
bilateral contract using one of four approaches:
o
Request
for information (RFI): This approach is not actually an official request
for a bid. Instead, it asks for "expressions of interest," solicits
feedback regarding capacity and capability to perform the work, and so on. The
RFI responses may be useful in developing the qualified sellers list.
o
Invitation
for Bid (Sealed Bid): Used for routine, well-defined items. Buyer wants
bids to get the best price. Does not usually involve negotiations and no
discussion is allowed.
o
Request
for Quotation: Used for relatively low dollar purchases of commodity items.
Discussion between buyer and seller is permitted. This approach may be
considered a "best value" search, which compares price to other
factors such as schedule, technical merit and past performance of potential
contractors.
o
Request
for Proposal: used for complex, nonstandard items of high dollar value.
Discussion and negotiation are usually involved.
5. Source Selection criteria: Used to rate
or score proposals. The criteria may be objective (the Pm must have a PMP) or
subjective (the PM must have appropriate experience). Sample criteria include:
·
Understanding of need
·
Warranty
·
Life cycle cost
·
Technical capability
·
Management approach
·
Financial and production capacity
·
Past performance
·
Production capability
·
Proprietary rights
12.2 Conduct
Procurements
This process obtains information such as bids and proposals
from prospective sellers, selects the winning response and awards a legally
binding contract. For the exam, one notable activity is the use of qualified
seller lists. Procurement (contracting) specialists develop such lists from a
variety of sources and determine who might have the ability to perform the
needed work. These lists can also speed up the process. Another notable fact is
that bidder conferences, if used, are performed as part of this step.
Independent estimates may be important if the procurement is noncompetitive and
you need to ensure that prices are fair reasonable.
For large, complex procurements, this process may be
performed numerous times for multiple contracts. Also, a common practice is to
screen the initial responses and create a list of competitors “in the
competitive range” (known to many people as the “short list”). More detailed
evaluations and negotiations are then conducted with sellers on the short list.
Another practice is the use of the “BAFO” technique (best and final offer). The
technique is used when procurement personnel want lower prices in the
proposals. Other key points:
·
Proposals are often organized into different
sections or volumes that are evaluated separately by different experts. For
example, common sections evaluated separately are technical approach, price,
schedule, management approach and past performance.
·
In some instance, organizations prefer (as a
risk mitigation strategy or as a cost competition factor) to have multiple
suppliers for certain products.
Conduct Procurements
|
||
Inputs
|
Tools
|
Outputs
|
1. Project
management plan
2. Procurement
documents
3. Source
selection criteria
4. Qualified
seller list
5. Seller
proposals
6. Project
documents
7. Make-or-buy
decisions
8. Teaming
agreements
9. Organizational
process assets
|
1. Bidder
conferences
2. Proposal
evaluation techniques
3. Independent
estimates
4. Expert
judgment
5. Advertising
6. Internet
search
7. Procurement
negotiations
|
1. Selected
sellers
2. Procurement
contract award
3. Resource
calendars
4. Change
requests
5. Project
management plan updates
6. Project
document updates
|
Nine Key Inputs for
conduct Procurements:
1. Project management plan: Contains the
procurement management plan which was an output of the previous process
(section 12.1).
2. Procurement documents: Describe in
section 12.1.3.4, an appropriate document is chosen to request seller responses
(IFB, RFQ and RFP).
3. Source selection criteria: The criteria
were developed as an output of the previous process (section 12.1.3.5) and are
now used to actually evaluate and compare the various bids or proposals.
4. Qualified seller list: A previously
screened list of potential sellers who have the ability to perform the work
probably already exists. If desired, this step would build on that list using
the internet, trade catalogs, site visits or references from previous
customers.
5. Seller proposals: Prepared and
submitted in response to the buyer’s procurement document package (PDP). A
proposal constitutes a legal offer and should be constructed carefully by the
seller. The PDP is sent by the buyer to prospective sellers (based on the
qualified seller list) and contains:
·
A procurement document (IFB, RFQ, RFP)
·
The evaluation
·
A cover letter with instructions: due date for
the proposal, table of contents or required format (if any), number of copies
and so on.
6. Project documents: Project documents
that may be considered at this point include the risk and any risk-related
contract decisions.
7. Make-or-buy decisions: Described in
section 12.1.3.3.
8. Teaming agreements: When teaming has
already begun, an interim agreement of some type may be guiding activities.
This step would finish formalizing and negotiating any necessary contractual
agreements.
9. Organizational process assets:
Organizational Process Assets that may be relevant include:
·
Qualified lists
·
Information on relevant past experience with
specific sellers
Seven Key Tools for
Conduct Procurements:
1. Bidder conferences: Used to ensure all
prospective sellers share a clear, common understanding of technical and
contract requirements. Most organizations are careful to ensure that all
potential sellers are given equal treatment and information.
2. Proposal evaluation techniques: Most
organizations that conduct major procurements have established source selection
procedures. These procedures establish the approach for evaluating, comparing
and selecting winning proposals.
3. Independent estimates: Procurement
organization prepares its own estimates as a cross-check or verification that
the bids are fair and reasonable. Also called “should cost” estimates, this
tool is especially important for non-competitive procurements (e.g. sole
source).
4. Expert judgment: A multi-disciplinary
team of experts (financial, technical, management) is usually required to
effectively evaluate proposals.
5. Advertising: The use of general
circulation sources such as newspapers and professional journals and
newsletters to expand the potential pool of sellers.
6. Internet search: The internet is of
great help in the procurement of items readily available in the marketplace.
Source and prices can be located quickly. However, the internet is often
insufficient for complex, developmental procurements.
7. Procurement negotiations: Clarification
and mutual agreement on the structure and requirements of the contract prior to
signing.
Common negotiation
tactics:
Deadline:
"We have to catch a flight at 5:00 p.m. and must complete the deal before
we leave."
Good cop/bad cop:
One person is helpful and understanding while the other is difficult and
demanding.
Fait accompli:
Pretending that some condition is essentially a "done deal" or not
negotiable at all.
Missing man:
"I'm sorry, only my boss can agree to that request and he or she isn't
here. Let's agree to do___________ instead. I can agree to that."
Limited authority:
"l can't agree to reduce the price by $100,000. I'm only authorized to
offer $50,000."
Delay: "Let's handle that issue at the next
meeting." May be a ploy leading to a deadline tactic. "Oops, we're
running out of time, so let's sign this deal and work out any issues
later."
Personal insults:
Designed to intimidate you and/or undermine your confidence.
Fair and reasonable:
A personal appeal that may be posed with a great deal of charm and
"folksiness." "You and I know what's going on here. Let's be
reasonable and work this out."
1. Selected Sellers: Sellers who have been
chosen as being in the competitive range and who have submitted a proposal that
has been accepted. The proposal becomes the basis for the contract (subject to
any last-minute negotiating of terms and conditions).
2. Procurement Contract Award: A legal
relationship subject to remedy in the courts. A contract is a mutually binding
agreement that obligates the seller to provide the specified product and
obligates the buyer to pay for it.
You must know the elements
of a legally enforceable contract:
·
The agreement must be voluntary- There must be both
an offer and an acceptance.
·
The agents must be legally authorized to enter
into a legal commitment. (The authorization can be written or verbal). In
business contracts, a delegation of procurement authority is often used to
identify precisely who is authorized to enter into a contract.
·
There must be sufficient cause, which is also
known as "consideration." An exchange of value must take place.
·
The contract must be for a legal purpose.
While there may be differences, the major components in most
contracts include the following:
·
Statement of work or deliverables
·
Period of performance and schedule baseline
·
Required performance reporting
·
Place of performance and delivery
·
Pricing and payment terms
·
Warranty and product support
·
Penalties and incentives
·
Subcontractor approvals
·
Handling of change requests
·
Dispute resolution procedures
·
Termination procedures
3. Resource Calendars: Specific quantity
and availability of contracted resources.
4. Change Requests: lf change requests are
generated during the procurement, they must be handled using integrated change
control procedures.
5. Project Management Plan Updates:
Elements of the plan that may be changed include:
·
Cost, schedule, and scope baselines
·
Procurement management Plan
6. Project Document Updates: Documents
that may be updated include:
·
Requirements documentation
·
Requirements traceability documentation
·
Risk register
12.3 Administer
Procurements
The buyer and the seller both perform contract
administration to ensure that the other party meets its contractual
obligations. The process involves monitoring performance, managing interfaces
if there are multiple providers, making changes and corrections, and processing
interim payments (often called progress payments which are based on the
seller's progress in completing the work). In some cases, contract
administration involves managing the early termination of a contract (for
cause, for convenience or for default). Several key project management
processes are used to help accomplish these aims:
·
Direct and manage project execution (Section
4.3)
·
Report performance (Sectionl0.5)
·
Perform quality control (Section 8.3)
·
Perform integrated change control (Section 4.5)
·
Monitor and control risks (Section 11.6)
Administer Procurements
|
||
Inputs
|
Tools
|
Outputs
|
1.
Procurement documents
2.
Project management plan
3.
Contract
4.
Performance reports
5.
Approved change requests
6.
Work performance information
|
1.
Contract change control system
2.
Procurement performance reviews
3.
Inspections and audits
4.
Performance reporting
5.
Payment systems
6.
Claims administration
7.
Records management system
|
1.
Procurement documentation
2.
OPA updates
3.
Change requests
4.
Project management plan updates
|
Six Key Inputs for
Administer Procurements:
1. Procurement Documents: The contract and
the SOW are two of the most important documents that would guide contract
administration.
2. Project Management Plan: contains the
procurement management plan which describes how each procurement process is to
be handled.
3. Contract: Described in Section
12.2.3.2.
4. Performance Reports: Seller performance
documentation in the areas of technical achievement and performance reports
(cost, schedule, resource variances and forecasts).
5. Approved Change Requests: May include
modifications to contract terms and conditions with the most important being
any effect on the triple constraint (scope, schedule and cost). Verbally
discussed but undocumented change requests should not be processed or
implemented.
6. Work Performance Information: Addresses
whether quality standards are being met, what costs have been incurred, the
completion status of deliverables, and what interim payments have been
requested and/or paid.
Seven Key Tools for
Administer Procurements:
1. Contract change Control system: As
always, establishes the procedures by which changes can be approved. Includes
paperwork, tracking, approval levels and dispute resolution procedures.
2. Procurement Performance Reviews: A structured
review of the seller's progress (cost, schedule, scope, quality). The purpose
of these reviews is to document successes and failures as well as demonstrate
whether the seller is able to complete the work.
3. Inspections and Audits: These quality management
techniques are used to check for compliance with contract requirements.
Inspections and audits are usually required by the buyer and supported by information
from the seller.
4. Performance Reporting: Documents the
contractor's relative effectiveness in achieving contract objectives.
5. Payment Systems: The payment system includes
appropriate reviews and approvals so that interim and final payments can be
made as appropriate. Payment systems are sometimes handled by the project
(larger programs) but are frequently handled by the accounts payable department
in the overall organization.
6. Claims Administration: contested or
constructive changes are those where the buyer and seller cannot agree on the terms
(cost, schedule) for a change. In Some cases, a dispute arises over whether
work item is a change in scope or is a legitimate part of the original scope.
7. If
the parties cannot resolve a claim themselves, the matter is then handled
through whatever dispute resolution procedures were established in the contract.
Dispute resolution can occur during project performance or after a project has
been closed.
8. Records Management System: Used to manage
contract documents and records. Usually involves an index of contract documents
with methods for retrieval, archiving and automation.
Four Key Outputs for
Administer Procurements:
1. Procurement Documentation: The contract
itself and supporting documentation such as schedules, approved and unapproved
change requests technical documentation, performance reports, invoices and
payment records, the results of inspections and audits, and the status of
deliverables.
2. Organizational process Assets Updates:
Key correspondence concerning audits, inspections, change requests, warnings
for unsatisfactory performance, and key decisions. Information about payment
schedules and how seller performance is documented would also be updated at
this stage.
3. Change Requests: Processed using
integrated change control. Disputed changes are usually given special attention
and documented separately.
4. Project Management Plan updates:
Elements of the plan that may be updated include:
·
Procurement management plan (to reflect approved
change requests, especially those affecting costs or schedules)
·
Baseline schedule (to reflect any significant
variances from the baseline or revisions to the baseline because of approved
changes)
12.4 Close
Procurements
Contract closure supports the close project or phase process
(integration management, Section 4.6). It involves product verification (was
the work completed correctly?) and administrative closeout (updating and
archiving of records). Early termination is a special case of contract closure
and can result from a mutual decision, from default by one of the parties, or
for convenience of the buyer. The rights of the parties should be defined in a
terminations clause in the contract.
Close Procurements
|
||
Inputs
|
Tools
|
Outputs
|
1. Project
management Plan
2. Procurement
documentation
|
1. Procurement
audits
2. Negotiated
settlements
3. Records
management system
|
1. Closed
procurements
2. OPA
updates
|
Two Key Inputs for
Close Procurements:
1. Project Management Plan: section
4.2.3.1.
2. Procurement Documentation: All
documentation is collected, indexed, and filed according to established
procedures. The information can be used for lessons learned, estimating future
contracts, and evaluating contractors for future procurements.
Three Key Tools for
Close Procurements:
1. Procurement Audits: Structured reviews
of the procurement process to identify successes and failures. The information
is used to improve the current project, future projects, and the overall
organization. Procurement audits are also known as lessons learned in some
areas.
2. Negotiated Settlements: Final
settlement of outstanding issues, claims, and disputes using negotiation if
possible. Alternate dispute resolution is used only when necessary.
3. Records Management System: Described in
Section 12.3.2.7.
Two Key Outputs for
Close Procurements:
1. Closed Procurements: The buyer provides
formal, written notice that the contract has been completed.
2. Organizational Process Assets Updates:
Should include the following:
·
Procurement
file: An official, complete set of indexed contract documentation.
·
Deliverable
acceptance: Formal, written notice that deliverables have been accepted or
rejected. Instructions on how to handle non- conforming deliverables should be
provided.
·
Lessons
learned documentation: Post-project evaluation is important because it
provides historical records that help in contractor selection on future
contracts (a past performance database to support the select sellers process).
If you want to acquire best SAP FICO Online Training | Simple Finance Online Training then contact with us.
ReplyDeleteYou truly did more than visitors’ expectations. Thank you for rendering these helpful, trusted, edifying and also cool thoughts on the topic.
ReplyDeleteProcurement Management Software
Purchase Management Software
e Procurement Management Software
Hey, If you want to enroll in PMP Certification course then you should click on this link - PMP Certification in India
ReplyDelete